DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2499
ee
ee
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
The Board also notes that you have applied for a correction to
your record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 30
years ago. Under the rules governing this Board, an application
for a correction of a naval record must be made within three
years after the discovery of the alleged error. Failure to file
within the prescribed three years may be excused only in cases
where the Board finds that it is in the interests of justice to
do so.
Although you neglected to assert your claim for an inordinately
long period of time without justification and you provided no
evidence as to why you did not seek to have the alleged error
corrected earlier, the Board still decided to review your case.
However, based on the circumstances of your record, including
your court-martial tn 1979, which was never set-aside, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its gecision upon submission of new and
Docket No.NROO6 91-14
it is important to keep in mind that
hes to all official records.
ection of an official
o demonstrate the
the Board. In this regard,
of regularity attac
Consequently, when applying for a cor?
naval record, the burden is on the applicant t
existence of probable material error or injustice.
a presumption
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR660 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nonetheless, your request was denied and the BCD was subsequently approved at all levels of review, and on 30 January 1976, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6179 14
This request was denied on 30 September 2013. #, three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 January 2015. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10695 14
DErARIMWEMN! Ur the RAY T PAAR PARP FRM PFr Ee TION Ae NAN Se preompr 701 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100i ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dear Master ‘
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01855-09
Documentary material considered by ‘the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material - error or injustice. Sincerely, Enclosure 30 Jun 09 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3391 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NRO3391-14 22 July 2014 for correction of your This is in reference to your application of 10 USC 1552. naval record pursuant to the provisions a” three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 2014. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5028-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3036 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3171 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 2 December 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrati regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of t Board. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse - use).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1805 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all — material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. as a result of the foregoing period of UA totalling 203.days, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order...